Verdict up front: Forex Signals Infinity is one of three forex signal apps published by BL Tech Pro. Unlike the other two it carries its own listing copy, and that copy makes a specific claim worth testing. It says the publisher shares the details of trades it has actually opened. We looked for those trades and found no record of them anywhere.
Key facts — checked 25 September 2026
Package name: com.mdbillalhossain1.forex_signal · Listed developer: BL Tech Pro · Installs: 100,000 plus · Store rating: 4.4 from 2,570 ratings · Sibling apps: Two more signal apps from the same publisher
One publisher, three signal apps
BL Tech Pro runs at least three forex signal apps accounting for more than 1.2 million installs between them. Forex Signals-Live Buy Sell carries over a million, Forex Signals Pro over 100,000, and this one over 100,000.
The other two are close to interchangeable. They share a bullet list including the same 100 plus pips profit daily promise, and the Forex Signals Pro listing still refers to Forex Signals-Live Buy Sell by name partway through its own description, because the text was pasted across without being edited.
This app is the exception, and it is worth being accurate about that. Its description is its own, written specifically for it rather than copied. That makes it the most individual of the three and, as it turns out, the one making the most checkable claim.
The claim the listing actually makes
The description opens by saying the publisher shares the details of the transactions it has opened on the forex and commodity markets, and that users will be informed about new trades and any changes to live ones through notifications.
Read that carefully, because it is a stronger statement than the usual signal app boilerplate. It does not say the app suggests trades or analyses the market. It says the operator opens positions with its own money and tells you what they are. That is a claim about real trades in a real account.
It is also, unusually for this category, a claim that could be proved. Anyone genuinely trading their own positions can produce a broker statement, or grant read only access to an account so that a third party platform computes the results from closed trades. We found no such statement, no read only account, no audited history and no published results of any kind. The one app in this set that makes a verifiable claim has published nothing to verify it with.
⚠ Verified evidence — checked 25 September 2026
- Listing claims the publisher shares details of trades it has actually opened
- No broker statement, read only account or audited record supports that claim
- Carries its own copy, while the two sibling BL Tech Pro apps share a pasted description
- Graphics promise high accuracy with no figure and no measurement stated
- No named analyst, drawdown figure or authorisation for investment advice
A rating is not a result
The 4.4 average from over 2,500 ratings is the reassurance most users rely on, and it does not carry the information they think it does.
Ratings measure the experience of using an app. On a signal app that means whether notifications arrive, whether the interface works and whether it feels professional. All of those can be good while the signals lose money. The rating and the profitability are separate things, and only one of them is being measured.
There is also a timing problem. Users tend to rate early, in the optimistic phase, and losses arrive later. Someone who funds an account, follows signals for a month and loses money rarely goes back to amend a rating left in week one. The average therefore reflects first impressions rather than outcomes.
What is absent from the listing
The store graphics promise daily five to ten free forex signals and describe them as high accuracy, without stating what that accuracy is or how it was measured.
Beyond that, the gaps are the ones common to the whole category. No analyst or team is named. No method is described beyond the claim that trades are opened. No track record is published. There is no drawdown figure, no win rate, no average win against average loss and no period covered. There is no regulatory authorisation for the provision of investment advice, and no risk warning proportionate to leveraged forex trading, in which the majority of retail accounts lose money.
Each absence removes a way of checking the product. Together they leave nothing to check at all. A user is left with a claim about trades, a promise of high accuracy, and a rating, and none of the three is evidence.
Where the real cost lands
A free signal app looks harmless because installing it costs nothing. The cost is not in the app. It is in the account you fund and the trades you place.
Retail forex is leveraged, and leverage compresses the time it takes to lose money. Regulators that require brokers to publish client outcomes consistently show that most retail accounts lose. Adding unverified signals to that does not improve the odds, because following an unexplained instruction removes your ability to judge risk or position size.
There is one request worth making before any money is involved, and it follows directly from what this listing claims. Ask for the statement. If the operator opens the trades it publishes, a broker statement or a read only account exists and can be shared in a single message. A provider that says it trades its own positions and cannot show them has told you the answer.
Our view: This is the one app in its publisher’s set that makes a claim capable of being proved, telling users it shares trades it has genuinely opened. No statement, read only account or audited record backs it up. Ask for the broker statement before you follow a single signal, and treat silence as the answer.
Sources, checked 25 September 2026: Google Play listings for com.mdbillalhossain1.forex_signal and sibling apps, listing text comparison, regulator registers




Comments are closed